The short answer is no. EPCs focus on predicted energy use, specifically regulated loads like heating and lighting, based on standardised assumptions. They do not reflect how buildings actually perform once occupied, nor do they account for the carbon locked into materials and construction processes. This narrow scope can lead to a misleading sense of sustainability, where a high EPC rating masks a high whole life carbon footprint.
For clients aiming to meet net zero targets, satisfy ESG criteria, or attract green finance, EPCs alone fall short. A building with an EPC A rating could still have significant embodied carbon or operational inefficiencies. As investor expectations evolve and planning policies begin to mandate whole life carbon reporting, the need for a more holistic approach is clear.
So what does a carbon smart strategy look like?



.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)




