Publication

Slow and steady: the changing face of English land supply

Summary: NPPF changes slow to impact supply in the land market

  • Revisions to the NPPF have created a more favourable planning environment, resulting in an 44% increase year on year in the number of residential applications submitted, according to Glenigan data.
  • The uptick in submissions will have a gradual impact on consents granted, with long decision timeframes from local authority planning teams limiting the flow of newly consented sites.
  • Despite increasing sharply, the volume of plots submitted on applications is still far below historic trends, further limiting the impact of a sudden influx of consented sites.
  • The growth in applications recorded is not uniform across England, and 34% of the country’s housing need is located in local authorities with a shrinking forward pipeline as new planning applications for housing remain below the number of consents granted over the last three years.

Recent changes to English planning policy have led to an increase in planning applications, sparking concerns that the land market could be overwhelmed with consented sites over the next few years, creating downward pressure on values.

In reality, applications have some way to go before they reach trends which were considered normal for most of the past decade, and the rate at which applications can progress through planning is still limited by the processing capacity of local authority planning teams.

  

Policy changes yet to fully unlock supply

Revisions to the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) in December 2024 introduced adjustments to overall housing need and routes to supply, creating a more favourable planning environment in which to deliver new homes.

The changes were received positively, with the introduction of a “Grey Belt” review and the reintroduction of mandatory housing targets in particular helping to improve confidence across the housebuilding industry. In Summer 2025, Savills found indications that the changes were beginning to have an impact, with 73% of residential capacity determined through appeal in Q1-Q3 2025 gaining planning consent, compared to an average over the last ten years of just 57%.

The policy adjustments have now filtered through to the wider planning system, with an uptick in applications submitted recorded in the first half of this year. Savills analysis of raw local authority applications suggests that applications for 320,000 homes were submitted in the year to Q3 2025, an increase of 44% on 2024. The sharp uptick is a notable contrast to recent trends, with the volume of plots on applications submitted falling by -42% in the three years to 2024.

 

Methodology

We have reviewed all lead applications submitted on sites across England with capacity to deliver at least 20 homes. We have compared the number of plots on those applications with the number of plots consented on sites with the same criteria each quarter to produce a ratio.

We have then applied this ratio to industry leading planning consent figures provided by HBF to estimate the number of plots on applications submitted each quarter.

 

 

Savills planning team reports that the heightened level of activity continued into Q4 2025, although no comprehensive data is available yet. However, the recent increase has not been enough to fully reverse the longer term decline in activity. Application volumes remain almost a third below the pre-pandemic 2017-19 norm, suggesting there is little chance of the land market seeing an oversupply of consented land over the next two to three years. Provisional planning consents data for the full year of 2025 also supports this conclusion, with the number of new homes receiving planning consent falling below 200,000.

 

The road to new home delivery

The recent flurry of application activity will also take some time to progress through the planning system. Despite a positive upward movement in applications, we anticipate a delay before the plots materialise into consents, and a selection of those applications submitted are unlikely to ever reach full permission stage. Past trends show that 8% of all lead applications submitted in England over the past decade were refused or withdrawn. With the current planning environment viewed by some as a time-limited opportunity, there may be more speculative applications submitted, which will increase the proportion of applications failing to reach permission stage.

For those applications that do succeed, decision times have increased over the past decade. Evidence from MHCLG shows that, excluding those using performance agreements, just 19% of major applications in England were determined within the statutory timeframe of 13 weeks in 2024, down from 47% in 2014.  Savills analysis of live applications and recently determined consents in the planning pipeline shows an average determination period of 14 months, increasing to over two years for sites with over 500 homes.

In the absence of significant additional resource for local planning authorities, it is likely that decision timescales will become longer as more applications are submitted. This will further slow the rate at which any increase in consented land will come to market.

 

Limitation by location

The overall growth in the planning pipeline disguises regional and local variation in activity, which will have important consequences for both planning opportunities and land market dynamics. In some local authorities, fewer applications have been submitted than consents granted over the past few years, and others have seen fewer consents granted than new homes completed. In each instance, these areas have seen their future pipeline shrink, limiting capacity for housebuilding activity, and creating a land market that is more at risk of under than over supply.

In 158 (54%) local authorities, new homes have been built out at a faster rate than new consents have been granted, meaning these areas are likely to be facing a shortage of consented land. A further 4% of local authorities have granted consent for only 100 more homes than have been completed in the last three years, risking falling delivery if any of the consented land doesn’t come forward. This imbalance has been most evident across the North of England, where affordability headroom for consumers has helped accelerate new home delivery rates. The issue has also persisted in the East of England, where water availability, nutrient neutrality and grid capacity have limited the volume of consents granted.

Similarly, despite the rise in planning activity over the last year, applications over the last three years are lower than the number of consents granted in 112 (38%) local authorities, pointing to a further contraction in the development pipeline. 86 local authorities have seen declines in both planning consents and applications. In these markets, competition to secure consented land is likely to remain high over the next two to three years given the ongoing limited supply.


 

The total housing need across all local authorities with a contraction in live applications was 124,700 homes per annum, equivalent to 34% of housing need nationally. Within this, 22 local authorities saw a major contraction, with the number of applications submitted over the last three years more than 50% lower than consents granted in the same period. The contraction in consents has been more widespread than applications. Almost 48% of housing need in England is distributed across local authorities with a deficit in new home permissions relative to current new home completions.

The future performance of land values is likely to therefore hinge tightly on location. There is little sign that the recent increase in planning applications will result in the land market becoming oversupplied with consented sites. Instead, in some locations, the pipeline is continuing to shrink, meaning that developers will continue to need to bid competitively, particularly to secure sites in the best locations.

For more information, our research hub shares the latest data and expert insight into the residential development and investment markets.